burning, such as using the flag for clothing or napkins. Another poll conducted by CNN in June 2006 found that 56 of Americans supported a flag desecration amendment. Constitution: of Mice and Men: Thesis An end to the controversy. . Thus, this Amendment is aimed not at banning the burning of flags, but at banning the expression of particular political views through the burning of flags. William Joseph Brennan,. A b "Bill Summary Status for the 109th Congress Library of Congress:.J. . 1 2, Encyclopedic, should Flag Burning be Illegal? "Bill Summary Status for the 106th Congress Library of Congress:.J. . Principle theories underlying these First Amendment principles include a robust national discourse about political and social ideas, individual self-realization, the search for truth, and speech as a "safety valve." These concepts are expounded in both the majority and dissenting opinions of the cases described below. It is also unclear whether " virtual flag desecration" (which could be defined as an artistic depiction of flag desecration, a computerized simulation of flag desecration, or burning any object which has a flag on it) would be subject to the amendment. Arguments for the amendment Proponents of the amendment argue that protecting the flag is necessary because of the uniquely important nature of the flag.
In 2005, the First Amendment Center published a report titled "Implementing a Flag -Desecration Amendment to the.S. Constitution: An end to the controversy. Or a new beginning?".21. After reading several current issues on whether the Flag Amendment should be passed or not, I am standing strong on my belief that I feel the Flag Amendment is unnecessary. The Flag Desecration Amendment, often referred to as the flag burning amendment, is a controversial proposed constitutional amendment to the United States Constitution that would allow.
Rehnquist wrote, "The American flag, then, throughout more than 200 years of our history, has come to be the visible symbol embodying our Nation. Johnson the Supreme Court did not find that it is unconstitutional to ban the burning of flags, but that it is unconstitutional to ban "the expression of particular political views" through the burning of flags. Supreme Court, to parse the exact meaning of ambiguous terms contained therein. As can be seen by the votes in the House of Representatives, support for the amendment appears to be slipping with only 286 'yea' votes during the 109th Congress in 2005, in contrast to the 312 'yea' votes a decade earlier during the 104th. See also edit References edit a b Flag-burning amendment fails by a vote, m, June 28, 2006.
The House Judiciary Committee today sent to the House floor a proposed constitutional amendment to protect the American flag.
Section I Purpose of the Amendment Subsection I Establish an official flag for Libertatem Subsection II Establish rights pertaining to the flag.
Opponents of the flag desecration proposal, including civil liberties groups and First Amendment defenders, point out the rarity of flag desecration in the United States.
While their passion for the flag is laudable, they overstate the benefits of an amendment.
First, the language of the proposed amendment, on its face, is limited.