of this entry. In that spirit, one could assert that it is always wrong to make the sorts of tradeoffs made in plea-bargaining, or indeed in deciding to devote resources to anything other than punishing the guilty if those resources might help ensure that the guilty are punished. 4.3 Moral puzzles of suffering Retributive justice holds that it is intrinsically (or non-instrumentally) good that wrongdoers suffer at the hands of punishers. This interpretation avoids first of the problems outlined above. The answer may be that actions speak louder than words.
An analysis of the idea of pure retribution
Retributive justice - Wikipedia
The, idea of, retribution in the Book of Ezekiel / AvaxHome
The, idea of, retribution in the Book of Ezekiel
One approach is to hold the repeat offender guilty of a culpable omission: the failure to organize his life in a way that reduces the risk of his reoffending (Lee 2009: 578). Foremost among these is the argument that we do not really have free will see section. But the idea of tracking all of a person's good and bad deeds, allen Ginsberg1 and all of her happiness or suffering, and aiming to align them is highly problematic. This view may move too quickly to invoke utilitarian or consequentialist considerations. Another is to defend a first-offender discount, reflecting human susceptibility to temptation (frailty). Her view is that punishment must somehow annul this affront. This claim comes in stronger and weaker versions. Strawson (1962 and developed. It is the view that wrongdoers forfeit their right not to suffer proportional punishment, but that the positive reasons for punishment must appeal to some other goods that punishment achieves, such as deterrence or incapacitation. If a person fails to exercise self-restraint even though he might have he renounces a burden which others have voluntarily assumed and thus gains an advantage which others, who have restrained themselves, do not possess. If positive desert provides a strong reason for action, then there might be little to no need for non-retributive reasons to justify punishment; if positive desert provides a weak reason to punish, then punishment may often not be justified unless there are strong non-retributive reasons.
The Ideal Culturally Sensitive Nursing Care, The Puritan Traditions and Ideals, Gods Idea to Humanity, Idealism v. reality,